Cardiac ischemic pain
Filippo Crea1, Achille Gaspardone2
1Istituto di Cardiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro
Cuore, Rome, Italy
2Cattedra di Cardiochirurgia, Università Tor Vergata, Rome,
Italy
Correspondence: Professor Filippo Crea, Istituto
di Cardiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo
A. Gemelli 8, Roma, Italy. Tel: +39 06 3051166, fax: +39 06 3055535,
e-mail:f.crea@tiscalinet.it
|
Abstract
At the turn of this century, Colbeck proposed that ischemic
cardiac pain may be related to distension of the ventricular
wall (“mechanical hypothesis”). Three decades later, Lewis
hypothesized that ischemic pain may be elicited by the intramyocardial
release of pain-producing substances induced by ischemia
(“chemical hypothesis”). Studies carried out in the last
10 years have lent strong support to the chemical hypothesis,
as they have consistently shown that adenosine is a mediator
of ischemic cardiac pain. Adenosine-induced ischemic cardiac
pain is mainly
mediated by stimulation of A1 receptors located in cardiac
nerve endings and is potentiated by substance P. Conversely,
the magnitude and rate of left ventricular dilatation during
ischemia do not predict the severity of angina. It is worth
noting, however, that stretching of epicardial coronary
arteries appears to potentiate the severity of angina caused
by myocardial ischemia. The nervous activity generated by
myocardial ischemia is modulated in intrinsic cardiac, mediastinal,
and thoracic ganglia. It is then further modulated in the
central nervous system and projects bilaterally to the cortex,
as demonstrated in humans using PET, where it is decoded
as a painful sensation. The causes responsible for the lack
of angina during myocardial ischemia are probably different
in patients presenting with either painless or painful myocardial
ischemia, in patients with predominantly painless ischemia,
and in diabetic patients. n Heart Metabol. 2002;16:5–8.
Keywords: Angina, adenosine,
bradykinin, ischemic heart disease
|
Introduction
Although patients with ischemic heart disease usually
consult their doctor because of angina symptoms, transient myocardial
ischemia or even necrosis can occur without pain, and, conversely,
severe angina-like pain may occur in the absence of detectable
myocardial ischemia. Thus the occurrence of pain can serve the
useful purpose of eliciting a protective reaction, but can also
become a major component of the disease when it is disproportionate
to the severity of the ischemic insult.
Causes of cardiac ischemic pain
In 1903, Colbeck proposed that cardiac ischemic pain
may be related to distension of the ventricular wall (the “mechanical
hypothesis”) [1]. Three decades later, Lewis
hypothesized that ischemic pain may be elicited by the intramyocardial
release of algogenic substances induced by ischemia (the “chemical
hypothesis”) [2].
Mechanical hypothesis
Ventricular dilatation is unlikely to be responsible
for anginal pain, as the rate and magnitude of left ventricular
dilatation during ergonovine-induced or spontaneous transient
ischemic episodes were found to be similar during both painful
and painless episodes [3]. Mechanical factors,
however, may play a role in activating nociceptors localized at
the level of the coronary arteries. The distension of the coronary
arterial wall can cause pain: at the end of two sequential balloon
inflations during coronary angioplasty, pain severity, normalized
for the severity of ischemia, is similar when the two inflations
are carried out using the same pressure, yet is more severe during
the second inflation when the latter is carried out at a higher
pressure [4].
Furthermore, we have recently observed that in a substantial proportion
of patients complaining of angina-like chest pain after stent
implantation, the pain may be related to a transient increase
in vascular tone at the site of the implanted stent which stretches
the arterial wall causing nociceptor activation
[5].
Chemical hypothesis
Although several substances have been investigated
as potential mediators of anginal pain, at present only two molecules
have been convincingly demonstrated to be involved in the genesis
of cardiac ischemic pain in man: adenosine and bradykinin.
Adenosine
Adenosine is rapidly formed during myocardial ischemia and is
released into the vascular bed. The intravenous administration
of adenosine causes a dose-dependent angina-like pain in normal
subjects [6]. Adenosine-induced pain is increased
by dipyridamole, which reduces adenosine cellular uptake, and
reduced by theophylline, which is an adenosine antagonist
[6]. Infusion of a similar dose of adenosine into the right
atrium fails to elicit pain, thus proving that pain elicited by
the intracoronary infusion of adenosine originates from the heart
[7].
Adenosine-induced cardiac pain is not secondary to myocardial
ischemia, as it generally occurs in the absence of ischemic ECG-like
changes and it can be induced by infusing adenosine in angiographically
normal coronary branches and in vascular beds, such as brachial
or femoral arteries, where ischemia caused by steal cannot occur
[8–10]. In patients with exercise-induced angina,
the severity of anginal pain is significantly reduced by pretreatment
with theophylline, a potent nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist,
in the presence of a similar severity of myocardial ischemia [11].
This finding indicates that the improvement of anginal pain produced
by theophylline is likely to be due also to the direct inhibition
of the algogenic effects of adenosine. Adenosine-induced pain
is not prevented by b-blockade, atropine, naloxone, nitroglycerine,
nifedipine, clonidine, cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors, or steroids
[12, 13], and is potentiated by substance P
[14].
In humans, the intravenous infusion of bamifylline, a selective
A1 receptor antagonist [15], reduces adenosine-induced
muscular and cardiac pain without affecting adenosine-induced
coronary vasodilatation, which is an A2 receptor-mediated effect
[16]. Furthermore, in patients with exercise-induced
angina, bamifylline reduces the severity of anginal pain normalized
for maximal ST-segment depression, thus suggesting that the improvement
in anginal pain produced by bamifylline is likely due to the direct
inhibition of the algogenic effect of endogenous adenosine of
the A1 adenosine receptors [17]. These findings
indicate that in humans the algogenic effects of adenosine are
mainly mediated by A1 receptors.
Bradykinin
Among substances released by ischemic myocardium, bradykinin has
been in vogue for more than 20 years as a potential mediator of
cardiac ischemic pain. Recently, we have shown that the intracoronary
infusion of bradykinin in patients with angina and coronary artery
disease causes cardiac pain that is similar to their habitual
angina [18]. Interestingly, bradykinin-induced
pain is abolished or reduced by acetylsalicylate, thus suggesting
that acetylsalicylate-sensitive mediators, such as prostaglandins,
are involved in the pathogenesis of bradykinin-induced pain. As
bradykinin is released in large amounts by the heart during ischemia,
it can be a natural stimulus for causing, via arachidonic acid
metabolites, excitation of the sensory receptors signaling pain
during myocardial ischemia.
Significance of cardiac ischemic pain
in different coronary syndromes
Cardiac ischemic pain does not provide information
on the causes of myocardial ischemia. However, information on
the causes of ischemic episodes and on the possible evolution
of myocardial ischemia can be obtained from the pattern of pain
recurrence and from the circumstances in which the pain occurs.
A stable pattern of occurrence of ischemic episodes with pain
suggests a stable cause of ischemia. Conversely, a recent onset
of ischemic episodes and/or a rapid worsening of their severity
and duration, or the presence of pain at rest suggest an unstable
cause.
Chronic stable angina
Although this form of angina is characterized by a
stable pattern of symptoms over months and years, a detailed history
of the circumstances in which anginal attacks develop can provide
useful information on the actual cause of ischemia. Attacks that
occur predictably only when a certain level of physical activity
is exceeded, suggest a fixed impairment of coronary flow reserve.
Attacks that occur unpredictably during levels of effort that
are usually well tolerated, suggest a variable impairment of coronary
flow reserve caused by “dynamic” coronary stenoses
[19]. The range of this modulation can be confirmed by assessing
the heart rate at which ischemic episodes occur during Holter
monitoring or exercise test after acute nitrate administration
[20].
Unstable angina
The sudden onset and rapid worsening of angina with
more severe and longer lasting attacks, and attacks occurring
at rest or during minimal physical effort, are a signal of an
unstable cause of ischemia and therefore demand prompt medical
attention and aggressive management. The diagnosis of instability
is easy when symptoms are rapidly worsening but cannot easily
be made only on the basis of the occurrence of angina at rest
or angina that occurs unpredictably during a degree of effort
well tolerated on other occasions. On the one hand, variability
of the anginal threshold and even occasional episodes of angina
at rest can occur over periods of months and years in patients
with chronic stable, predominantly effort-related, angina [21].
On the other hand, episodes of angina at rest, usually with preserved
effort tolerance, are typical of variant angina. In this latter
syndrome the attacks are typically nocturnal, or occur in the
early morning hours, sometimes associated with palpitation due
to arrhythmias. The attacks sometimes occur in clusters within
a 30- to 60-min period, leaving the patient angina-free throughout
the rest of the day whilst engaged in normal activities [21].
Acute myocardial infarction
In acute myocardial infarction, pain is usually, but not always,
more severe and more frequently accompanied by angor animi. The
severity of pain is in itself a reason for alarm; but even when
symptoms are not severe, it is the persistence of pain that demands
prompt attention. Despite the extreme severity of ischemia, which
characterizes myocardial infarction, the Framingham study showed
that about 34% of acute myocardial infarctions were not associated
with pain that could be recognized by the patient. The proportion
of painless myocardial infarctions was higher in diabetic and
hypertensive patients. In men, but not women, there was a tendency
to an increase in the proportion of painless infarctions with
age. An intriguing observation of the Framingham study was that
24% of men and 33% of women with painless myocardial infarction
had episodes of angina pectoris [22]. As the
algogenic stimuli operating during myocardial infarction are likely
to be much more powerful than those operating during episodes
of transient myocardial ischemia, these findings further emphasize
how the central modulation of algogenic messages plays a pivotal
role in determining the perception of cardiac ischemic pain.
Conclusions
Mechanical stimuli are unlikely to play a major role
in the genesis of anginal pain during daily life, but they may
play a role in patients undergoing percutaneous interventions.
At present, the clinical evidence indicates that adenosine, via
activation of A1 adenosine receptors, and bradykinin, via arachidonic
acid metabolites, are algogenic substances involved in the pathogenesis
of cardiac ischemic pain.
The relationship between myocardial ischemia and cardiac ischemic
pain is rather elusive, as the severity of pain is not necessarily
proportionate to the severity of ischemia and as only the pattern
and duration of pain can provide clues to the actual causes of
ischemia.
REFERENCES
1. Colbeck EH. Angina pectoris: a
criticism and a hypothesis. Lancet. 1903;1:793–795.
2. Lewis T. Pain in muscular ischemia — its relation
to anginal pain. Arch Intern Med. 1932;49:713–727.
Sequence and magnitude of ventricular volume
changes in painful and painless myocardial ischemia.
Davies GJ, Bencivelli W, Fragasso G, Chierchia S, Crea F, Crow
J, Crean PA, Pratt T, Morgan M, Maseri A.
Department of Cardiology, Royal Postgraduate Medical School,
Hammersmith Hospital, London, England.
Stimulation of left ventricular stretch receptors has been
proposed as a possible mechanism for the occurrence of cardiac
pain. Changes in left ventricular volume were continuously
assessed in 12 patients during 11 spontaneous (two painful) and 12
ergometrine-induced (nine painful) ischemic attacks with a
precordial scintillation probe and blood pool labeling with
technetium-99m. In all ischemic episodes, spontaneous or induced,
painful or painless, severe dilatation of the left ventricle was
consistently observed. These changes always preceded the onset of
ST segment shifts and occurred long before pain, when present. The
maximum increase in end-diastolic volume was slightly greater in
painful than in painless episodes, 38 +/- 8.0% versus 28 +/-
12.4%, but no significant difference was observed in the rate of
volume change or in the maximum increase of end-systolic volume
(133 +/- 50% and 110 +/- 27.3%), stroke volume (-28 +/- 15% and
-25 +/- 12.4%), or ejection fraction (-32 +/- 8.7% and -26 +/-
6.0%). Although the maximum end-diastolic volume achieved is
greater in painful episodes, this effect cannot be separated from
that of duration, and, furthermore, there was no significant
difference in end-diastolic volume at the moment chest pain began.
Thus, in patients with angina at rest, transient asymptomatic ST
segment shifts are consistently associated with large changes in
left ventricular volume, similar to those observed during painful
episodes. The rate and extent of acute left ventricular dilatation
do not appear to be factors directly causing anginal pain.
PMID: 3396167 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Mechanisms of cardiac pain during coronary
angioplasty.
Tomai F, Crea F, Gaspardone A, Versaci F, Esposito C,
Chiariello L, Gioffre PA.
Servizio Speciale di Diagnosi e Cura di Emodinamica, Italy.
OBJECTIVES. This study was conducted to establish whether the
cardiac pain patients experience during coronary angioplasty is
modulated by 1) the stretching of the coronary artery wall, and 2)
the mechanisms responsible for the ischemic preconditioning.
BACKGROUND. Anecdotal experimental observations indicate that
stretching of the coronary artery wall is a stimulus adequate to
cause cardiac pain. Furthermore, recent experimental studies
indicate that adenosine, a mediator of the anginal pain, appears
to play an important role in the genesis of ischemic
preconditioning. METHODS. We randomly allocated 48 consecutive
patients undergoing coronary angioplasty into two groups. In Group
A the second balloon inflation was performed at a higher level
than the first; in Group B the first two inflations were performed
at the same level of balloon pressure. The mean values (+/- 1 SD)
of ST segment shift on the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)
and the intracoronary ECG were measured at the end of each
inflation period. Severity of cardiac pain was also obtained at
the same time by using a visual analog scale. RESULTS. The mean ST
segment shift during the second balloon inflation was
significantly less than that during the first inflation in both
groups of patients (12.8 +/- 9.3 vs. 18.5 +/- 11.9 mm, p < 0.001
and 13.7 +/- 10.1 vs. 21.3 +/- 13.9 mm, p < 0.001, respectively,
in Groups A and B). Yet, the severity of cardiac pain during the
second inflation was greater than that during the first inflation
in Group A (40.8 +/- 32.7 vs. 26.9 +/- 27.2 mm, p < 0.01), whereas
it was lesser in Group B (23.1 +/- 20.7 vs. 32.9 +/- 29.6 mm, p <
0.05). However, in the latter group, pain severity after
normalization for the mean ST segment shift was similar during the
first and second inflations (2.1 +/- 2.4 vs. 2.7 +/- 3.6, p = NS).
CONCLUSIONS. During coronary angioplasty, the cardiac pain
experienced by patients is caused in part by stretching of the
coronary artery wall. If the stretching is maintained at a
constant level during repeated coronary occlusions, the cardiac
pain is entirely predicted by the severity of myocardial ischemia
and therefore does not appear to be directly modulated by the
mechanisms responsible for the ischemic preconditioning.
PMID: 8245345 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Chest pain after coronary artery stent
implantation.
Versaci F, Gaspardone A, Tomai F, Proietti I, Crea F,
Chiariello L, Gioffre PA.
Cattedra di Cardiochirurgia, Universita di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome,
Italy. francescoversaci@yahoo.it
A sizeable proportion of patients who undergo successful coronary
artery stent implantation experiences chest pain immediately after
the procedure and/or in the following months in the absence of in-stent
restenosis. We investigated this phenomenon in 57 consecutive
patients with stable angina who underwent successful stent
implantation. Chest pain characteristics were assessed before
stent implantation and during 6-month follow-up. All patients
underwent coronary angiography within 6 months of the procedure 48
hours after exercise thallium-201 perfusion scintigraphy. Patients
who did not exhibit in-stent restenosis underwent an ergonovine
test at the end of routine coronary angiography. During follow-up,
15 patients complained of chest pain. Six of these patients
exhibited scintigraphic evidence of myocardial ischemia and in-stent
restenosis at angiography. In the remaining 9 patients, chest pain
occurred in the absence of in-stent restenosis at angiography. In
8 of these patients intracoronary ergonovine administration
reproduced their habitual pain, whereas it did not cause any pain
in the 42 patients who were completely asymptomatic at follow-up
and without in-stent restenosis. Ergonovine caused more intense
vasoconstriction and nitroglycerin caused more intense
vasodilation of the reference coronary diameter in patients with
than in patients without ergonovine-induced pain (-17 +/- 3 vs -9
+/- 3%, p <0.001; 9 +/- 6 vs 5 +/- 4%, p <0.02, respectively). In
conclusion, chest pain with features similar to habitual angina
occurs in the absence of in-stent restenosis in 1/5 of patients
after stent implantation and appears to be associated with more
intense coronary vasoreactivity.
PMID: 11867031 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Angina pectoris-like pains provoked by
intravenous adenosine.
Sylven C, Edlund A, Brandt R, Beermann B, Jonzon B.
Publication Types:
PMID: 3094750 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Comment in:
Role of adenosine in pathogenesis of anginal
pain.
Crea F, Pupita G, Galassi AR, el-Tamimi H, Kaski JC, Davies G,
Maseri A.
Cardiovascular Unit, RPMS-Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
The intravenous infusion of adenosine provokes anginalike chest
pain. To establish its origin, an intracoronary infusion of
increasing adenosine concentrations was given in 22 patients with
stable angina pectoris. During adenosine infusion, 20 patients had
chest pain without electrocardiographic signs of ischemia. They
all reported that the chest pain was similar to their usual
anginal pain. In 10 of the 22 patients adenosine was also infused
into the right atrium, but it never produced symptoms at the doses
that had provoked chest pain during intracoronary infusion. In
seven other patients, the intracoronary adenosine infusion was
repeated after intravenous administration of aminophylline, an
antagonist of adenosine P1-receptors. Aminophylline decreased the
severity of adenosine-induced chest pain (assessed with a visual
analog scale) from 42 +/- 22 to 23 +/- 17 mm (p less than 0.002).
In the remaining five of the 22 patients, monitoring of blood
oxygen saturation in the coronary sinus during intracoronary
adenosine administration showed that maximum coronary vasodilation
was achieved at doses lower than those responsible for chest pain.
A single-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of the effect
of aminophylline on exercise-induced chest pain was also performed
in 20 other patients with stable angina. Aminophylline, compared
with placebo, decreased the severity of chest pain at peak
exercise from 67 +/- 21 to 51 +/- 23 mm (p less than 0.02),
despite the achievement of a similar degree of ST-segment
depression. Finally, the effect of intravenous adenosine was
compared in 10 patients with predominantly painful myocardial
ischemia and in 10 patients with predominantly silent
ischemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
PMID: 2297824 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Relation between stimulation site of cardiac
afferent nerves by adenosine and distribution of cardiac pain:
results of a study in patients with stable angina.
Crea F, Gaspardone A, Kaski JC, Davies G, Maseri A.
Cardiovascular Research Unit, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United
Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to establish whether
stimulation of cardiac sensory receptors in different myocardial
regions results in different distributions of cardiac pain.
BACKGROUND. Previous studies have shown that adenosine provokes
cardiac pain through stimulation of sensory receptors in the
absence of myocardial ischemia. In this study adenosine was used
to obtain a regional stimulation of cardiac sensory receptors.
METHODS. Increasing doses of adenosine (0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/min)
were selectively infused into the right and then into the left
coronary artery in 26 patients with stable angina. RESULTS. No
patient developed ischemic electrocardiographic changes during
either adenosine infusion. Eighteen patients experienced cardiac
pain during both infusions. Despite the stimulation of sensory
receptors in different myocardial regions, 13 patients experienced
cardiac pain in the same body area. Adenosine-induced pain was
always similar to the anginal pain. By contrast, the remaining
five patients experienced adenosine-induced cardiac pain in
different body areas. In two of these patients, the distribution
of anginal pain was similar to that experienced during one of the
two adenosine infusions. In the remaining three patients, the
distribution of anginal pain was similar to that experienced
during adenosine infusion into the right coronary artery during
some anginal episodes and to that experienced during adenosine
infusion into the left coronary artery during other episodes.
CONCLUSIONS. During stimulation by adenosine of sensory receptors
in different myocardial regions, the majority of patients
experience cardiac pain in the same body area; only a few
experience pain in different areas. These differences might be
caused by different organizations of the ascending neural pathways
to the cortex. Our results suggest that in the same patient
different distributions of pain during anginal attacks are
probably due to ischemia in different myocardial regions.
Publication Types:
PMID: 1452922 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9. Sylven C, Jonzon B, Borg G, Fredholm
BB, Kaijser L. Adenosine injection into the brachial artery produces
ischemia-like pain or discomfort in the forearm. Cardiovasc Res.
1988;22:674–678.
10. Gaspardone A, Crea F, Tomai F, et al. Algogenic
effects of the intra-femoral infusion of adenosine. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1992;19:330A
Comment in:
Effect of theophylline on exercise-induced
myocardial ischaemia.
Crea F, Pupita G, Galassi AR, el Tamimi H, Kaski JC, Davies GJ,
Maseri A.
Cardiovascular Unit, Royal Postgraduate Medical School,
Hammersmith Hospital, London.
In a single-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial in 20
patients with stable angina pectoris, intravenous theophylline
ethylenediamine (aminophylline), 7 mg/kg, increased the time to
onset of angina by 46%, the heart-rate/blood-pressure product (an
index of myocardial oxygen consumption) at 1 mm ST segment
depression by 22%, and exercise duration by 24%. In a subsequent
double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 8 patients a single oral
dose of theophylline (375 mg) increased the time to onset of
angina by 56%, the heart-rate/blood-pressure product at 1 mm ST
segment depression by 22%, and the exercise duration by 35%.
Infusion of theophylline ethylenediamine during angiography (10
patients) did not affect the diameter of epicardial coronary
arteries. The beneficial effects of theophylline may be due to
redistribution of coronary blood flow from non-ischaemic to
ischaemic myocardium.
Publication Types:
- Clinical Trial
- Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 2564505 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Angina pectoris. Clinical characteristics,
neurophysiological and molecular mechanisms.
Sylven C.
Department of Medicine, Huddinge Hospital, Sweden.
Publication Types:
PMID: 2645560 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Mechanisms of pain in angina pectoris--a
critical review of the adenosine hypothesis.
Sylven C.
Karolinska Institute, Department of Medicine, Huddinge University
Hospital, Sweden.
Clinical characteristics: Angina pectoris represents a visceral
pain caused by reversible myocardial ischemia. The majority of
ischemic attacks are symptomless. When pain is manifested, it
appears late during the ischemic event. The pain is complex in its
quality and bears little relation to the region of myocardial
ischemia. Pain shows a sensitive dependence on initial conditions
suggesting a mechanism with deterministic chaotic dynamics for the
association between myocardial ischemia and pain.
Neurophysiological substrate: Ganglia are present within the
heart, particularly in epicardial fat. The blood supply of
intrinsic cardiac ganglia arises primarily from branches of the
proximal coronary arteries. Both afferent and efferent neurons
within the intrinsic cardiac nervous system exist, while the
majority of neurons in that location may be local circuit neurons.
Integration takes place not only in the intrinsic cardiac nervous
system, but also in mediastinal, middle cervical, and stellate
ganglia. Cardiac afferent receptors are also connected to cell
bodies in dorsal root and nodose ganglia, as well as intrathoracic
ganglia. Myocardial regions have no spatial representation in
these ganglia. Adenosine, among a number of substances, can
modulate the activity generated by cardiac afferent nerve endings
and intrinsic cardiac neurons. Such effects appear to be exerted
at A1 receptors. Adenosine as a pain messenger: During myocardial
ischemia adenosine is released in large quantities into the
interstitial space. The endothelium takes up the major amount of
adenosine. Thus only small increments of adenosine are detected in
the blood-stream. Given as an intravenous bolus to healthy
volunteers or to patients with ischemic heart disease and angina
pectoris, adenosine provokes angina pectorislike pain, which is
similar to habitual angina pectoris with regard to quality and
location. Pain is provoked in the absence of ECG signs of
ischemia. Patients with asymptomatic myocardial ischemia are less
sensitive to adenosine, whereas patients with Syndrome X are more
sensitive with respect to adenosine-provoked pain. When adenosine
is given intraarterially, including into the coronary arteries,
pain is provoked in the corresponding vascular bed.
Adenosine-provoked pain and ischemic pain are counteracted by
previous administration of the adenosine receptor antagonist
theophylline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Publication Types:
PMID: 8110616 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Substance P potentiates the algogenic effects
of intraarterial infusion of adenosine.
Gaspardone A, Crea F, Tomai F, Iamele M, Crossman DC,
Pappagallo M, Versaci F, Chiariello L, Gioffre PA.
Servizio Speciale di Diagnosi e Cura di Emodinamica, Universita di
Roma Tor Vergata, Italy.
OBJECTIVES. This study investigated whether substance P
potentiates the muscular and cardiac pain caused by the
intraarterial infusion of adenosine, an autocoid known to induce
muscular and cardiac ischemic-like pain in humans. BACKGROUND.
Substance P is involved in the generation of neurogenic
inflammation and causes cutaneous hyperalgesia. Because substance
P is present in perivascular nerves it might also cause muscular
and cardiac hyperalgesia. To test this hypothesis its effects on
adenosine-induced muscular and cardiac pain were investigated in
humans. METHODS. A randomized, crossover study of the algogenic
effects of the intrailiac infusion of increasing scalar doses
(from 125 to 2,000 micrograms/min) of adenosine or substance P
(11.2 pmol/min) for 3 min, followed by the simultaneous infusion
of substance P plus the same doses of adenosine, was carried out
in nine patients with no evidence of peripheral vascular disease.
A similar protocol was carried out by infusing increasing scalar
doses of adenosine (from 50 to 800 micrograms/min) or substance P
(11.2 pmol/min) for 3 min, followed by the simultaneous infusion
of substance P plus the same doses of adenosine, into the left
coronary artery of eight patients with angina. Pain severity,
assessed by a visual analog scale, is presented as median. The
remaining data are presented as mean value +/- 1 SD. RESULTS. All
patients experienced pain during both adenosine and substance P
plus adenosine infusion; no patient experienced pain during the
infusion of substance P alone. During intrailiac infusion, all
patients experienced pain in the right leg that occurred earlier
(207 +/- 152 vs. 321 +/- 154 s, p < 0.05) and was greater (47 vs.
30 mm, p < 0.05) during the simultaneous infusion of substance P
plus adenosine than during the infusion of adenosine. Similarly,
during intracoronary infusion, all patients experienced chest pain
that occurred earlier (409 +/- 242 vs. 596 +/- 210 s, p < 0.05)
and was greater (51 vs. 33 mm, p < 0.05) during the simultaneous
infusion of substance P plus adenosine than during infusion of
adenosine. No patient exhibited electrocardiographic signs of
ischemia. CONCLUSIONS. Substance P does not cause muscular or
cardiac pain, but it provokes muscular and cardiac hyperalgesia.
Publication Types:
- Clinical Trial
- Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 7518480 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Selective activity of bamifylline on adenosine
A1-receptors in rat brain.
Abbracchio MP, Cattabeni F.
Institute of Pharmacological Sciences, University of Milan, Italy.
The activity of the xanthine derivative bamifylline on central
adenosine A1 and A2 receptors has been evaluated with
radio-receptor binding in rat brain in comparison with other
structure-related compounds. Bamifylline displaced
3H-Cyclo-hexyl-adenosine and 3H-Diethyl-8-phenyl-xanthine with a
potency similar to that of 8-phenyl-theophylline, suggesting a
high activity on A1-receptor subtype. In contrast, when
3H-N-Ethyl-carboxamido adenosine was used to label A2 adenosine
receptors in rat striatum, bamifylline displayed a lower activity
comparable to that of enprofylline, an alkyl- xanthine considered
a very weak antagonist of adenosine receptors. By calculating for
each xanthine derivative its relative potency at A1 and A2
receptors (A2/A1 ratio), bamifylline turned out being the most
selective A1 adenosine receptor antagonist so far tested.
PMID: 3432321 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16. Belardinelli L. Adenosine system in the
heart. Drug Dev Res. 1993;28:263–267.
17. Gaspardone A, Crea F, Tomai F, et al. Muscular
and cardiac adenosine-induced pain is mediated by A1 receptors.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:477–482.
Effect of acetylsalicylate on cardiac and
muscular pain induced by intracoronary and intra-arterial infusion
of bradykinin in humans.
Gaspardone A, Crea F, Tomai F, Versaci F, Pellegrino A,
Chiariello L, Gioffre PA.
Divisione di Cardiochirurgia, Universita di Roma Tor Vergata,
Rome, Italy. gaspardone@tin.it
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the algesic activity of bradykinin
(BK) in humans and the effects of acetylsalicylate on muscular and
cardiac BK-induced pain. BACKGROUND: Bradykinin is released by the
ischemic myocardium and may be involved in the genesis of ischemic
pain. METHODS: Increasing doses of BK (from 30 to 960 ng/min) were
randomly infused, for periods of 2 min each, into the iliac artery
of 10 patients. The same protocol was repeated 30 min after the IV
administration of 1 g of acetylsalicylate. In eight other patients
with coronary artery disease, the same increasing doses of BK, for
periods of 2 min each, were infused into the left coronary artery.
The same protocol was repeated 30 min after the IV administration
of 1 g of acetylsalicylate. Time to pain onset and maximal pain
severity were obtained. RESULTS: Before acetylsalicylate
administration, all patients experienced pain during intra-iliac
infusion of BK. After acetylsalicylate, eight patients did not
experience any pain during BK infusion (p = 0.0014), and in the
two remaining patients, time to pain onset and maximal pain
severity were similar to those recorded before acetylsalicylate.
Before acetylsalicylate administration, all patients experienced
pain similar to their habitual angina during intracoronary BK
infusion. After acetylsalicylate, six patients did not experience
any pain during BK infusion (p = 0.0098), whereas in the two
remaining patients time to pain onset and maximal pain severity
were similar to those recorded before acetylsalicylate.
CONCLUSIONS: Intra-iliac infusion of BK causes muscular pain, and
its intracoronary infusion in patients with coronary artery
disease causes cardiac pain, which is similar to their habitual
angina. The BK-induced pain is abolished or reduced by
acetylsalicylate, thus suggesting that acetylsalicylate-sensitive
mediators, such as prostaglandins, are involved in its
pathogenesis.
Publication Types:
- Clinical Trial
- Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 10400014 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Mechanisms and significance of cardiac ischemic
pain.
Maseri A, Crea F, Kaski JC, Davies G.
Cardiovascular Research Unit, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Publication Types:
PMID: 1529095 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20. Kaski JC, Crea F. Practical assessment
of the role of dynamic coronary stenoses in patients with stable
exertional angina. In: Maseri A, Sobel B, Chierchia S, eds. Hammersmith
Cardiology Workshop Series. Vol 3. New York, NY: Raven Press;
1987:117–125.
The changing face of angina pectoris: practical
implications.
Maseri A.
PMID: 6132091 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Incidence, precursors and prognosis of
unrecognized myocardial infarction.
Kannel WB, Cupples LA, Gagnon DR.
Section of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Boston University
School of Medicine, Mass.
PMID: 2220449 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
|