Home About Latest issue Back issues Images Dictionary of Cardiac Metabolism E-mail alert Contact

Microvascular angina: a new potential target for trimetazidine? 

Dr Pierre Sabouret 
Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France

A 66-year-old female patient presented to the hospital with 18 min of chest pain and was admitted to the cardiac emergency ward.
The patient had a history of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, diagnosed 8 years earlier, and type 2b dyslipidemia (hypercholesterolemia with elevated low-density and very-low-density lipoproteins associated with hypertriglyceridemia,), discovered 7 years earlier. She was currently being treated with an oral sulfonylurea and fenofibrate.
On arrival, the patient received intravenous nitroglycerin, aspirin, low molecular weight heparin and an oral beta-blocker. Her chest pain resolved, and, on physical examination, this mildly/moderately obese patient was in no apparent distress.
The 12-lead ECG showed a pattern of ST-segment elevation in the anteroseptal and apical regions. The creatinine phosphokinase-MB peak was 460 UI/l and troponin Ic was 2 mg/l (normal value <0.5). Over 4 days, the ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities resolved.
On coronary angiography, moderate anteroseptal and apical hypokinesis were seen, consistent with the electrocardiographic diagnosis of a non-Q-wave infarction. However, the patient had no significant coronary stenosis. The ergotamine test was negative. Despite this, the etiology of the myocardial infarction was presumed to be vasospastic in origin and atenolol was replaced by sustained-release verapamil 240 mg.
Before discharge, an exercise stress test was found positive and accompanied by exercise-limiting chest pain at 150 W with a maximal heart rate of 154 bpm (100% of the MPHR) (Figure 1).


Figure 1. Treadmill test no. 1 (treatment with verapamil alone).

To improve the persistent and activity-limiting anginal symptoms and improve the patient’s exercise tolerance, she was started on trimetazidine 20 mg t.i.d.
At the follow-up visit 1 month later, the patient described a marked decrease in the frequency of her anginal attacks. A second exercise stress test carried out the same day showed no ischemic ST-T changes. The patient had no chest pain even at a maximal workload of 150 w and a peak heart rate of 143 bpm (93% of MPHR) (Figure 2).


Figure 2. Treadmill test no. 2 (treatment with verapamil and trimetazidine).

Discussion

Epidemiology of coronary heart disease (CHD) in women
Although young women are relatively immune to cardiovascular disease (CVD), at least in part because of their hormonal status, CVD has become the major cause of death in women in developed countries.[1] Coronary heart disease (CHD) accounts for much of this and occurs on average 7–10 years later in women than in men.[2,3] Although the frequency of CHD increases exponentially with age, the rates observed in women are still lower than those in men. This trend may change somewhat in the future in light of the increasing number of young female smokers.[4,5]
Although the principal risk factors are the same in both sexes, the prevalence differs somewhat and the absolute mortality risk associated with each risk factor is generally lower in women than in men, with the exception of diabetes mellitus.[6–8]

Diagnosis and clinical pattern of CHD in women
The clinical presentation and natural history of angina pectoris often differ between women and men, and the diagnosis in women may be more difficult to make.[7,9] The Framingham study reported that women are more likely than men to experience an unrecognized, or silent, myocardial infarction (MI).[7]
The exercise stress test has been shown to have a lower accuracy for the identification of coronary artery disease in women than in men, although the basis for this remains unclear.[10,11] Myocardial perfusion imaging has also been found to be less specific for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women than in men, largely due to breast attenuation.[12,13]
Furthermore, women are more likely to have syndrome X, defined as the presence of clinically typical anginal chest pain, as well as evidence of ischemia on the exercise stress test, in the absence of significant coronary artery disease.[14] Such was the case for the patient in this report.

Syndrome X
The increased prevalence of syndrome X in women, as well as its reported association with the menopause, has led to the theory of a hormonal trigger, possibly estrogen deficiency, which could in turn lead to an imbalance in vasomotor tone involving the coronary arteries. However, syndrome X is likely a clinical entity of diverse etiologies and pathophysiological mechanisms. A subset of patients may have coronary artery disease limited to only small arteries, so-called microvascular angina. On the initial studies using electron microscopy of coronary biopsies in patients with syndrome X,[14] many endothelial nuclei in capillaries were found to be swollen, with an irregular narrowing of the arterioles and small vessels and proliferating and deformed smooth muscle cells. Although the pathophysiology of syndrome X is unclear, it is a common problem for which therapies are needed. One approach to therapy, which we used with success in this patient, is the metabolic approach using a metabolic agent.

The metabolic approach in stable angina and syndrome X
A number of recent studies have shown that the metabolic agent, trimetazidine, is an effective treatment for stable angina pectoris.[15–21] By specifically inhibiting the long-chain 3-ketoacyl-coenzyme A thiolase, trimetazidine causes a partial inhibition of fatty acid beta-oxidation.[22] This leads to an optimization of cardiac metabolism during ischemia and reperfusion, reducing acidosis and preserving energy production for contractility.
The metabolic approach with trimetazidine in monotherapy has been shown to be as effective as a beta-blocker (propranolol) in patients with chronic stable angina.[15] Other studies have demonstrated the value of adding trimetazidine to another agent (beta-blocker, calcium channel blocker or long-acting nitrate).[17–21] For example, in combination with a beta-blocker, trimetazidine has been shown to be more effective than the combination of a beta-blocker and a long-acting nitrate (isosorbide dinitrate).[17] The association of trimetazidine with diltiazem is also useful and well tolerated.[18,19] Such an additive benefit could be anticipated from the distinct mechanism of action of trimetazidine from the hemodynamic drugs. Furthermore, this benefit occurs without incurring any unwanted hemodynamic side effects.
Thus, the efficacy of trimetazidine in stable angina pectoris has been well documented in controlled studies. Trimetazidine may also be beneficial in the setting of syndrome X, as was the case for this patient. Two recent studies have reported positive results.
The first study included 35 patients with microvascular angina.[23] Microvascular angina was defined as typical exertional chest pain and positive exercise test results (>1 mm ST-segment depression and typical chest pain) with a completely normal coronary angiogram. None of the patients had hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiomyopathy, coronary artery spasm or conduction disturbances. The effects of trimetazidine (60 mg daily) were investigated in a double-blind study comprising two 4-week treatment periods. After a 1-week washout period, patients received placebo for 4 weeks; after another week of washout, patients received trimetazidine for 4 weeks. No other drug was prescribed. Exercise testing was performed at the end of the placebo and trimetazidine treatment periods. Patients were also studied with the ambulatory ECG monitoring test before treatment and at the end of both treatment periods. The number of anginal attacks at the second week and thereafter was significantly decreased with trimetazidine compared with placebo (P < 0.0001). On treadmill testing, the time to 1 mm ST-segment depression and total exercise time were significantly longer in the trimetazidine group, and the maximum ST depression was significantly less (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, P < 0.0005, respectively). Rogacka and colleagues[24] found similar benefit with trimetazidine on clinical symptoms and exercise tolerance in 28 patients with syndrome X.
The exact role of trimetazidine in patients with syndrome X remains to be determined, but there is evidence that trimetazidine may be as beneficial in these patients as it is in patients with chronic stable angina and coronary artery disease.

CONCLUSION
Even if the precise pathophysiology of microvascular angina remains unclear and without consensus on its treatment, many investigators believe that coronary microvascular dysfunction and intracellular metabolic changes are the main etiologic factors. The metabolic approach with trimetazidine, which is highly effective in reducing symptoms and improving exercise capacity in chronic stable angina, may also be useful in certain patients with syndrome X. 

REFERENCES
1. World Health Statistics Annuals 1982–1994. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1982–1994.

2: Lancet 1999 May 8;353(9164):1547-57 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Comment in: Click here to read 
Contribution of trends in survival and coronary-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA project populations. Monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease.

Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Mahonen M, Tolonen H, Ruokokoski E, Amouyel P.

Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit (MONICA Quality Control Centre for Event Registration), University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, UK. h.tunstallpedoe@dundee.ac.uk

BACKGROUND: The WHO MONICA (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease) Project monitored, from the early 1980s, trends over 10 years in coronary heart disease (CHD) across 37 populations in 21 countries. We aimed to validate trends in mortality, partitioning responsibility between changing coronary-event rates and changing survival. METHODS: Registers identified non-fatal definite myocardial infarction and definite, possible, or unclassifiable coronary deaths in men and women aged 35-64 years, followed up for 28 days in or out of hospital. We calculated rates from population denominators to estimate trends in age-standardised rates and case fatality (percentage of 28-day fatalities=[100-survival percentage]). FINDINGS: During 371 population-years, 166,000 events were registered. Official CHD mortality rates, based on death certification, fell (annual changes: men -4.0% [range -10.8 to 3.2]; women -4.0% [-12.7 to 3.0]). By MONICA criteria, CHD mortality rates were higher, but fell less (-2.7% [-8.0 to 4.2] and -2.1% [-8.5 to 4.1]). Changes in non-fatal rates were smaller (-2.1%, [-6.9 to 2.8] and -0.8% [-9.8 to 6.8]). MONICA coronary-event rates (fatal and non-fatal combined) fell more (-2.1% [-6.5 to 2.8] and -1.4% [-6.7 to 2.8]) than case fatality (-0.6% [-4.2 to 3.1] and -0.8% [-4.8 to 2.9]). Contribution to changing CHD mortality varied, but in populations in which mortality decreased, coronary-event rates contributed two thirds and case fatality one third. INTERPRETATION: Over the decade studied, the 37 populations in the WHO MONICA Project showed substantial contributions from changes in survival, but the major determinant of decline in CHD mortality is whatever drives changing coronary-event rates.

Publication Types:
  • Multicenter Study

PMID: 10334252 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3: J Hum Hypertens 1998 Oct;12(10):667-73 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in women.

Holdright DR.

Department of Cardiology, The Middlesex Hospital, London, UK.

Publication Types:
  • Review
  • Review, Tutorial

PMID: 9819013 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4: Circulation 1993 Dec;88(6):2548-55 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Comment in:
Prognosis after the onset of coronary heart disease. An investigation of differences in outcome between the sexes according to initial coronary disease presentation.

Murabito JM, Evans JC, Larson MG, Levy D.

Framingham Heart Study, MA 01701.

BACKGROUND. Differences exist between men and women in prognosis after the onset of coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS AND RESULTS. All Framingham Heart Study subjects with the onset of clinically apparent coronary disease from 1951 through 1986 were studied to compare prognosis in men and women according to CHD presentation. Coronary disease presentations included angina, coronary insufficiency (unstable angina), recognized myocardial infarction, unrecognized myocardial infarction, and coronary death. Less than 1% of subjects were lost to follow-up for overall mortality. Cox modeling was used to examine the sex differences in outcome for each coronary presentation. New nonfatal coronary disease developed in 750 men (mean age, 63 years) and 583 women (mean age, 67 years). After onset of angina, men were at greater risk than women for myocardial infarction (hazards ratio [HR], 2.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45 to 3.34) and coronary death (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.36) after adjustment for age and coronary disease risk factors. After a recognized myocardial infarction, there was a trend toward greater risk for overall mortality in women than men after adjustment for age and risk factors (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.08). In contrast, after an unrecognized myocardial infarction, men were at increased risk for death compared with women (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.15). CONCLUSIONS. Women fare at least as poorly as men after recognized myocardial infarction, whereas women have a more favorable outlook than men after the onset of angina or unrecognized myocardial infarction. The favorable outcome in women after angina and unrecognized myocardial infarction is due, in part, to greater misclassification of these coronary events in women than in men.

PMID: 8252666 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5: Lancet 1992 Mar 21;339(8795):702-6 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Comment in:
Relation between coronary risk and coronary mortality in women of the Renfrew and Paisley survey: comparison with men.

Isles CG, Hole DJ, Hawthorne VM, Lever AF.

Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, UK.

Most epidemiological and intervention studies in patients with coronary artery disease have focused on men, the assumption being that such data can be extrapolated to women. However, there is little evidence to support this belief. We have completed a fifteen-year follow-up of 15,399 adults, including 8262 women, who lived in Renfrew and Paisley and were aged 45-64 years when screened between 1972 and 1976. We identified 490 deaths from coronary heart disease (CHD) in women and 878 in men. Women were more likely to have high cholesterol, to be obese, and to come from lower social classes than men, but they smoked less and had similar blood pressures. The relative risk--top to bottom quintile (95% Cl)--of cholesterol for coronary death after adjustment for all other risk markers was slightly greater in women (1.77 [1.45,2.16]) than in men (1.56 [1.32, 1.85]), but absolute and attributable risk were lower. Thus, women in the top quintile for cholesterol had lower coronary mortality (6.1 deaths per thousand patient years) than men in the bottom quintile (6.8 deaths per thousand patient years). Moreover, it was estimated that there would have been only 103 (21%) fewer CHD deaths in women, yet 211 (24%) fewer in men, if mortality had been the same for women and men in the lowest quintiles of cholesterol. Trends showing similar relative risks in these women, but lower absolute and attributable risks than in men, were present for smoking, diastolic blood pressure, and social class. There was no relation between obesity and coronary death after adjustment for other risks. Our results suggest that some other factors protect women against CHD. The potential for women to reduce their risk of CHD by changes in lifestyle may be less than for men.

PMID: 1347584 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6: Arch Intern Med 1993 Dec 13;153(23):2626-36 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Coronary artery disease in women. Risk factors, evaluation, treatment, and prevention.

Kuhn FE, Rackley CE.

Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women. Unfortunately, the problem of cardiovascular disease in women has been largely ignored as women have been enrolled in limited numbers or excluded entirely from many of the major trials on which treatment of cardiovascular disease have been based. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that a gender bias against aggressive intervention and treatment of cardiovascular disease in women may exist. This article reviews the risk factors, methods of identification, and treatment of coronary artery disease in women, as well as the potential benefits of postmenopausal estrogen.

Publication Types:
  • Review
  • Review, Academic

PMID: 8250659 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

7. Stokes JS, Kannel WB, Wolf PA et al. The relative importance of selected risk factors for various manifestations of cardiovascular disease among men and women from 35 to 64 years old: 30 years’ follow-up in the Framingham study. Circulation 1987; 75 (suppl V): 65–73.

8: BMJ 1997 Sep 20;315(7110):722-9 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Erratum in:
  • BMJ 1998 Jun 20;316(7148):1881
Click here to read 
Comparison of the prediction by 27 different factors of coronary heart disease and death in men and women of the Scottish Heart Health Study: cohort study.

Tunstall-Pedoe H, Woodward M, Tavendale R, A'Brook R, McCluskey MK.

Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Ninewells Hospital, and Medical School, Dundee. h.tunstallpedoe@dundee.ac.uk

OBJECTIVE: To compare prediction by 27 different factors in men and women of coronary heart disease events, coronary deaths, and deaths from all causes. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Scottish population study. SUBJECTS: In 1984-7 random sampling of residents aged 40-59 produced 11,629 men and women who generated survey clinic questionnaires, examination findings, and blood and urine specimens. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subsequent death, coronary artery surgery, and myocardial infarction. Risks were calculated for each category of factor or fifth of continuous variables. 27 factors were ranked by descending age adjusted hazard ratio of the top to bottom class in each factor, by sex and end point. RESULTS: Follow up averaged 7.6 years, during which the 5754 men had 404 coronary events, 159 coronary deaths, and 383 deaths and the 5875 women 177, 47, and 208 respectively. The rankings for factors for the three end points were mainly similar in men and women, although hazard ratios were often higher in women. Classical risk factors ranked better for predicting coronary risk than newer ones. Yet strong prediction of coronary risk was no guarantee of significant prediction of all cause mortality. Findings included an anomalous coronary protective role for type A behaviour in women; raised plasma fibrinogen as a strong predictor of all end points; and an unexpectedly powerful protective relation of dietary potassium to all cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These initial unifactorial rankings and comparisons must be interpreted with caution until potential interaction, confounding, and problems of measurement and causation are further explored.

PMID: 9314758 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9: N Engl J Med 1996 May 16;334(20):1311-5 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Comment in: Click here to read 
The evaluation of chest pain in women.

Douglas PS, Ginsburg GS.

Harvard-Thorndike Laboratory, Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Publication Types:
  • Review
  • Review, Tutorial

PMID: 8609950 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10: Am J Cardiol 1975 Aug;36(2):169-73 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Significant sex differences in the correlation of electrocardiographic exercise testing and coronary arteriograms.

Sketch MH, Mohiuddin SM, Lynch JD, Zencka AE, Runco V.

Two hundred fifty-one patients (195 male and 56 females) referred for evaluation of chest pain were studied by multistage submaximal stress testing and selective coronary arteriography. In men with positive exercise tests the incidence rate of true positive exercise test results--that is, positive tests associated with 75 percent of greater coronary stenosis--was 89 percent in contrast to a 33 percent incidence rate of true positive exercise test results in women. The incidence rate of false positive excercise test results--that is, positive tests associated with no coronary stenosis or less than 50 percent stenosis--was 8 percent in men in contrast to 67 percent in women. Conversely, the incidence rate of false negative exercise test results (that is, negative exercise tests associated with 75 percent or greater coronary stenosis) was higher in men (37 percent) than in women (12 percent). It is concluded that in men a positive multistage stress test is useful in predicting the presence of significant coronary artery disease although a negative stress test cannot be relied upon to rule out the presence of significant disease. In women, a positive exercise test is of little value in predicting the presence of significant coronary artery disease, whereas a negative test is quite useful in ruling out the presence of significant disease. New criteria should be developed for stress testing of women.

PMID: 1155337 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11: Circulation 1977 Nov;56(5):756-61 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Diagnostic value of history and maximal exercise electrocardiography in men and women suspected of coronary heart disease.

Detry JM, Kapita BM, Cosyns J, Sottiaux B, Brasseur LA, Rousseau MF.

PMID: 912834 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12: Am J Cardiol 1982 May;49(7):1632-7 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Exercise thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy in women: correlation with coronary arteriography.

Friedman TD, Greene AC, Iskandrian AS, Hakki AH, Kane SA, Segal BL.

PMID: 7081050 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13: N Engl J Med 1991 Jul 25;325(4):221-5 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Comment in:
Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease.

Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM.

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS. Previous studies at individual hospitals have reported differences in the use of major diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for women and men with coronary heart disease. To assess whether these differences can be generalized, we performed retrospective analyses of coronary angiography and revascularization (coronary-artery bypass surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) in women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease in 1987, using abstract data on 49,623 discharges in Massachusetts and 33,159 discharges in Maryland. We used multiple logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds of the use of a procedure, controlling for principal diagnosis, age, secondary diagnosis of congestive heart failure or diabetes mellitus, race, and insurance status. RESULTS. The adjusted odds of undergoing angiography were 28 percent and 15 percent higher for men than for women in Massachusetts and Maryland, respectively (95 percent confidence intervals for the odds ratios, 1.22 to 1.35 and 1.08 to 1.22). The respective adjusted odds of undergoing revascularization were 45 percent and 27 percent higher for men than for women (95 percent confidence intervals, 1.35 to 1.55 and 1.16 to 1.40). Because these differences could be related to differing thresholds for hospital admission, we performed a second analysis limited to patients with diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (11,865 discharges in Massachusetts and 6894 discharges in Maryland), a group in which all patients would be expected to receive hospital care. The male-to-female odds ratios in both states remained similar in magnitude and were statistically significant for angiography and revascularization. CONCLUSIONS. These findings demonstrate that women who are hospitalized for coronary heart disease undergo fewer major diagnostic and therapeutic procedures than men. These differences may represent appropriate levels of care for men and women, but it is also possible that they reflect underuse in women or overuse in men. Further study should assess the cause of these differences and their effect on patients' outcomes.

PMID: 2057022 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

14. Schlant RC, Alexander RW. Diagnosis and management of patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. In: Alexander W, Schlant R, Fuster V, eds. Hurst’s the heart. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998; 1275–1305.

15: Br J Clin Pharmacol 1994 Mar;37(3):279-88 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Trimetazidine: a new concept in the treatment of angina. Comparison with propranolol in patients with stable angina. Trimetazidine European Multicenter Study Group.

Detry JM, Sellier P, Pennaforte S, Cokkinos D, Dargie H, Mathes P.

Saint-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

1. Trimetazidine has a direct anti-ischaemic effect on the myocardium without altering the rate x pressure product or coronary blood flow. 2. The effects of trimetazidine (20 mg three times daily) were compared with those of propranolol (40 mg three times daily) in a double-blind parallel group multicentre study in 149 men with stable angina. 3. Reproducibility of exercise performance was verified during a 3 week run-in placebo washout period. All patients had > 1 mm ST-depression on exercise test. 4. After 3 months, similar anti-anginal efficacy was observed between the trimetazidine (n = 71) and propranolol (n = 78) groups. No significant differences were observed between trimetazidine and propranolol as regards anginal attack rate per week (mean difference P-TMZ: 2; 95% CI: -4.4, 0.5) and exercise duration (mean difference P-TMZ: 0 s; 95% CI: -33, 34) or time to 1 mm ST segment depression (mean difference P-TMZ: 13 s; 95% CI: -24, 51). Heart rate and rate x pressure product at rest and at peak exercise remained unchanged in the trimetazidine group but significantly decreased with propranolol (P < 0.001 in all cases). With both drugs there was a trend to decreased ischaemic episodes in the 46% patients who experienced ambulatory ischaemia on Holter monitoring. Six patients stopped trimetazidine and 12 propranolol. Of these, five in each group were withdrawn because of deterioration in cardiovascular status. 5. The results suggest that trimetazidine and propranolol at the doses studied have similar efficacy in patients with stable angina pectoris.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Publication Types:
  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

PMID: 8198938 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16: Am J Cardiol 1998 Oct 1;82(7):898-901 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut
Click here to read 
Effects of trimetazidine on ischemic left ventricular dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease.

Lu C, Dabrowski P, Fragasso G, Chierchia SL.

Istituto Scientifico H. San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

We studied 15 patients with chronic coronary artery disease (13 men aged 62 +/- 8 years) undergoing dobutamine (5 to 40 microg/kg/min) echocardiography at the end of two 15-day treatment periods with placebo and trimetazidine (20 mg 3 times daily) given in random order, according to a double-blind, crossover design. Results show that trimetazidine improves resting left ventricular function and reduces the severity of dobutamine-induced ischemic myocardial dysfunction.

Publication Types:
  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

PMID: 9781975 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


17. Michaelides AP, Spiropoulos K, Dimopoulos K et al. Antianginal efficacy of the combination of trimetazidine-propranolol compared with isosorbide dinitrate-propranolol in patients with stable angina. Clin Drug Invest 1997; 13: 8–14.

18: Heart 1997 Oct;78(4):353-7 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut
Click here to read 
Combination treatment with trimetazidine and diltiazem in stable angina pectoris.

Manchanda SC, Krishnaswami S.

Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

OBJECTIVE: To assess antianginal efficacy and possible adverse haemodynamic effects of combination treatment with trimetazidine and diltiazem in patients with stable angina. DESIGN: Double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial of four weeks duration. SETTING: Outpatient department of two Indian hospitals. SUBJECTS: 64 male patients with stable angina, uncontrolled on diltiazem alone. INTERVENTIONS: Diltiazem 180 mg and trimetazidine 60 mg, or diltiazem 180 mg and placebo daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in exercise time to 1 mm ST segment depression. RESULTS: 33 patients (55%) had no exercise induced angina at 3 mm ST segment depression at inclusion in the study (silent ischaemia). Intention to treat analysis showed that of 32 patients in each treatment group, the number (%) of patients responding to trimetazidine compared to placebo was: for anginal attacks, 28 (87.5) v 15 (46.9), p < 0.001; for exercise time to 1 mm ST segment depression, 21 (65.6) v 9 (28.1), p < 0.003; for exercise time to angina, 12 (37.5) v 5 (15.6), p < 0.05; and for maximum work at peak exercise, 17 (53.1) v 8 (25), p < 0.02. Compared to placebo, there was net improvement with trimetazidine in mean anginal attacks of 4.8/ week (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.5 to 2.1; p < 0.002); in mean exercise times at 1 mm ST segment depression of 94.2 seconds (95% CI 182.8 to 5.6; p < 0.05), and at onset of angina of 113.1 seconds (95% CI 181.6 to 44.6; p < 0.02); and in mean maximum work at peak exercise of 1.4 metabolic equivalents (95% CI 2.4 to 0.3; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stable angina uncontrolled with diltiazem had a clinically important improvement after combination treatment with trimetazidine, without adverse haemodynamic events or increased side effects.

Publication Types:
  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

PMID: 9404250 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19: Am J Cardiol 1995 Aug 24;76(6):12B-16B Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Combination therapy of trimetazidine with diltiazem in patients with coronary artery disease. Group of South of France Investigators.

Levy S.

Division of Cardiology, Hopital Nord, University of Marseille School of Medicine, France.

The efficacy of trimetazidine, an antianginal agent with a direct effect on ischemic myocardium, has been tested alone or in combination with beta blockers or nifedipine. The combination with diltiazem, a widely used calcium antagonist, has not been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of oral trimetazidine (20 mg 3 times daily) in combination with oral diltiazem (60 mg three times daily). This was a multicenter, placebo-controlled study with a follow-up period of 6 months. Patients with stable angina and a positive exercise electrocardiogram before and after 15 days of diltiazem therapy were included. The 67 patients were randomized to diltiazem plus placebo (group I, 35 patients) and diltiazem plus trimetazidine (group II, 32 patients). Follow-up included a bicycle ergometer maximal exercise test and a physical examination at inclusion and at 3 and 6 months. The 2 groups were similar in terms of ergometric parameters, except for the ischemic threshold, defined as the time to 1-mm ST-segment depression. The latter was shorter in group II. Comparison of exercise tests performed at inclusion and after 6 months of therapy in both groups showed that the ischemic threshold was significantly prolonged (2 minutes 41 seconds; p < 0.001) in group II. This was not the case for group I, which showed a 41-second prolongation only (difference not significant). The work (kPM) produced at 1-mm ST-segment depression was also significantly increased in group II (1,445.9 kPM; p < 0.001) compared with group I (563.7 kPM; p = 0.012).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Publication Types:
  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

PMID: 7645522 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

20. Efficacy and tolerance of trimetazidine in combination one of the antianginal drugs in patients with stable effort angina. Diagnostyka i Leczenie w Kardiologii 1997; 4: 237–247.
21. Szwed H, Sadowski Z, Pachocki R et al. Trimpol II — multicenter study. Efficacy and safety of trimetazidine in patients with stable angina pectoris under beta-blocker therapy. Preliminary results. Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 478.

22: Circ Res 2000 Mar 17;86(5):580-8 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Comment in: Click here to read 
The antianginal drug trimetazidine shifts cardiac energy metabolism from fatty acid oxidation to glucose oxidation by inhibiting mitochondrial long-chain 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A thiolase.

Kantor PF, Lucien A, Kozak R, Lopaschuk GD.

Cardiovascular Research Group and the Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Trimetazidine is a clinically effective antianginal agent that has no negative inotropic or vasodilator properties. Although it is thought to have direct cytoprotective actions on the myocardium, the mechanism(s) by which this occurs is as yet undefined. In this study, we determined what effects trimetazidine has on both fatty acid and glucose metabolism in isolated working rat hearts and on the activities of various enzymes involved in fatty acid oxidation. Hearts were perfused with Krebs-Henseleit solution containing 100 microU/mL insulin, 3% albumin, 5 mmol/L glucose, and fatty acids of different chain lengths. Both glucose and fatty acids were appropriately radiolabeled with either (3)H or (14)C for measurement of glycolysis, glucose oxidation, and fatty acid oxidation. Trimetazidine had no effect on myocardial oxygen consumption or cardiac work under any aerobic perfusion condition used. In hearts perfused with 5 mmol/L glucose and 0.4 mmol/L palmitate, trimetazidine decreased the rate of palmitate oxidation from 488+/-24 to 408+/-15 nmol x g dry weight(-1) x minute(-1) (P<0.05), whereas it increased rates of glucose oxidation from 1889+/-119 to 2378+/-166 nmol x g dry weight(-1) x minute(-1) (P<0.05). In hearts subjected to low-flow ischemia, trimetazidine resulted in a 210% increase in glucose oxidation rates. In both aerobic and ischemic hearts, glycolytic rates were unaltered by trimetazidine. The effects of trimetazidine on glucose oxidation were accompanied by a 37% increase in the active form of pyruvate dehydrogenase, the rate-limiting enzyme for glucose oxidation. No effect of trimetazidine was observed on glycolysis, glucose oxidation, fatty acid oxidation, or active pyruvate dehydrogenase when palmitate was substituted with 0.8 mmol/L octanoate or 1.6 mmol/L butyrate, suggesting that trimetazidine directly inhibits long-chain fatty acid oxidation. This reduction in fatty acid oxidation was accompanied by a significant decrease in the activity of the long-chain isoform of the last enzyme involved in fatty acid beta-oxidation, 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A (CoA) thiolase activity (IC(50) of 75 nmol/L). In contrast, concentrations of trimetazidine in excess of 10 and 100 micromol/L were needed to inhibit the medium- and short-chain forms of 3-ketoacyl CoA thiolase, respectively. Previous studies have shown that inhibition of fatty acid oxidation and stimulation of glucose oxidation can protect the ischemic heart. Therefore, our data suggest that the antianginal effects of trimetazidine may occur because of an inhibition of long-chain 3-ketoacyl CoA thiolase activity, which results in a reduction in fatty acid oxidation and a stimulation of glucose oxidation.

PMID: 10720420 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
23: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANGIOLOGY 1999 Jan;8(1):40-43 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut
Click here to read 
The Effect of Trimetazidine in the Treatment of Microvascular Angina.

Nalbantgil S, Altinti&gbreve; A, Yilmaz H, Nalbantgil I I, Onder R.

Ege University Medical School, Cardiology Department, Izmir, Turkey

Although the pathophysiology of microvascular angina is unclear, intracellular metabolic changes are believed to be the main factors. Trimetazidine has an intracellular metabolic effect in coronary insufficiency. The effect of trimetazidine in microvascular angina is unknown. Thirty-five patients (8 men, 27 women, age 36-57 years, mean 43.9 +/- 6.4 years) with microvascular angina were included in this study. The effects of trimetazidine (60 mg daily) were investigated in a placebo-controlled, double-blind study consisting of two 4-week treatment periods. Patients were assessed by symptom-limited exercise testing (Bruce protocol). Heart rate and systolic blood pressure at rest, peak exercise, and the time of 1 mm ST segment depression were not significantly different between placebo and trimetazidine treatment. Trimetazidine prolonged total exercise time and time to 1 mm ST depression compared with placebo. Maximum ST depression was less in patients with trimetazidine therapy than those with placebo. It is concluded that trimetazidine has a beneficial effect in cases with microvascular angina.

PMID: 9826407 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
24: Coron Artery Dis 2000 Mar;11(2):171-7 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut

Effects of trimetazidine on clinical symptoms and tolerance of exercise of patients with syndrome X: a preliminary study.

Rogacka D, Guzik P, Wykretowicz A, Rzezniczak J, Dziarmaga M, Wysocki H.

Department of Internal Medicine, University School of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

BACKGROUND: Trimetazidine diminishes angina and improves tolerance of exercise of patients with ischemic heart disease, and has no influence on blood pressure and heart rate. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of trimetazidine on angina symptoms and exercise tolerance in patients with syndrome X. METHODS: We investigated the effect of trimetazidine on the clinical symptoms and tolerance of exercise of 34 patients (20 women and 14 men, aged 32-60 years) with syndrome X (angina pectoris, positive result of exercise test, and normal coronary angiogram). The exercise test was performed before initiation of oral administration of trimetazidine therapy (20 mg three times a day) and 1 and 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: We obtained negative results of exercise treadmill tests for four patients (11.76%) after 1 month and five patients (14.71%) after 6 months of trimetazidine treatment. There was also a decrease in the incidence of effort angina after 6 months of treatment (26 patients or 76.47% before treatment versus 13 patients or 38.23% after 6 months of treatment). The drug had no significant influence on the heart rate and blood pressure. The duration for which patients could exercise was significantly prolonged by 1 month (652.9 +/- 206.2 versus 563.4 +/- 190.4 s, P = 0.0047) and 6 months (650.3 +/- 207.8 s, P = 0.0094) of treatment with trimetazidine. CONCLUSION: Treatment with trimetazidine decreases signs of angina during exercise and improves tolerance of exercise of patients with syndrome X.

Publication Types:
  • Clinical Trial

PMID: 10758819 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Although great care has been taken in compiling the information given in this website,
the publisher or the sponsor is not responsible for the continued currency of the information,
for any errors or omissions, or for any consequence arising therefrom.
© 2009 Les Laboratoires Servier     Updates